Called clivia minata appreciation evaluation standard of thinking

How to appreciate called clivia minata, LanJie disputed that. This is very normal, because "beauty" in everyone''s heart are not be completely?

A condensing dozens of aram painstaking care home "called clivia minata appreciation evaluation standard" has been with me more than ten years, often turn, often read, often think. Personal thought, this standard in the development, dissemination to promote called clivia minata called clivia minata knowledge, strengthening social to the understanding of the called clivia minata played an important role. However, with the passage of time, the rich and people to the provenance of deep understanding called clivia minata gradually, LanJie to standard in the talk also more up. Hear and personal main thinking are:

1 and in addition to the standard in the rigid, veins, delicate degree, such as the role of brightness have certain outside, some content such as a form, the aspect ratio, head type provisions of competitions in the actual have been much effect. Everyone in the appreciation of almost to consider this not also, because of long leaves have long leaves beauty, pointed the beauty of a point, is 3:1 is beautiful, 5:1 will not beautiful? And the head of the beautiful round radius, pikehead, and will not beautiful?

2, with the passage of time, the "standard" want to don''t complement revision? In 2004, in 2006 in changchun flower show, although or to the standard "give priority to, but have different score changes. Explain in the standard of produce, are to the original "standard" has begun to the new thinking.

3 and different types of called clivia minata no comparison, different kinds of called clivia minata more no comparison, but why must use the same standard to measure? Now the name of international called clivia minata has had six big kinds (have said seven categories, and swamp called clivia minata), if use "called clivia minata appreciation evaluation standard" is obviously not to measure and does not cover, since can''t cover, whether should continue to be called "called clivia minata appreciation evaluation standard"?

4, "standard" ignore strains, only heavy "conditions", as long as "conditions" enough, no matter the other. This in the reality doesn''t seem to be most people recognized. In addition, many people put forward fully comply with "conditions" must be "the high-quality goods"? As some of the "high clusters". So, completely according to the standard "is out of the error or into the larger error?

Many years of practice we see, even in a class called clivia minata big flower, the "standard" won''t be covered. For example: very distinctive "called clivia minata miniascape" (some call it "group of LAN") in addition to pay attention to the bright and the exquisite blade, more exquisite "elegant and free and easy, strewn at random have send" the modelling effect, this needs blade to some, some soft long, and the requirements of the standard in the conflict. Be like again "colored" called clivia minata, also is usually said "the color LAN", its connoisseurship point, main or the leaf''s color and stripe (LAN veins is qualitative, the foundation of it), it will not call "colored". Obviously, the standard for the cover. So, we feel the standard "seems to fit more leaf, yield per plant called clivia minata short of appreciation, and not a covers the entire called clivia minata genera of the" called clivia minata appreciation evaluation standard ".

Perhaps it is more than deposition of thinking, Beijing called clivia minata association in 2007 Beijing orchid exhibition in comparison, started the classification comparison of beneficial exploration, will be divided into comparison: short of leaf groups, YeYi group (colored), different flowers group, miniascape group. In 2009, shenyang orchid show also are classified appraisal. Should say these are all feel different types of called clivia minata lack of comparable, must to more actual, more fair comparison of development attempt.

So how do the appreciation and evaluation "good" called clivia minata? For this reason I put forward: "classification appreciation, group comparison" train of thought. Also is the different types of called clivia minata according to different standard to appreciate, different types of called clivia minata with different standard to comparison.

In practice, it can quickly determine the standards, formulated as soon as possible, can''t soon set the standards or disputes big first out principle, then, according to the development gradually established. For example, to in, short leaves varieties, the appropriate adjustment some content outside, can be extended the original standard in the For colored called clivia minata, Abram in a high quality, veins good premise, can start with "stable quality, bright color, individual plant form complete" for the principle For called clivia minata miniascape, and that light and exquisite, and on the basis of "select material, modelling elegant arrows, reasonable spending more colourful, use basin fastidious" as the basic principle For different flowers, can consult some overseas experience: monochromatic color is great and flowers-after color spendthe United States and colorful, strange, strange flower appearing in beauty (the strange and don''t blame). As for this classification is appropriate, whether science, the need to seriously about, I just put forward a kind of thought it.

How to appreciate, evaluation called clivia minata may everyone has their own opinions and tendency, it is normal. Because, in addition to have personal aesthetic different views outside, everyone called clivia minata grasp the knowledge to the understanding of the development process called clivia minata are not exactly the same, also must have a constantly know process, who could be from historical limitations. But good academic debate, to our overall, accurate understanding called clivia minata and promote industry development called clivia minata are significant.